Skip to main content

Eriksen Flanker Task

The Eriksen Flanker Task measures attentional control and conflict resolution (Eriksen & Eriksen, 1974). A central target arrow is flanked by surrounding arrows that either match or conflict with its direction. The participant must respond to the center arrow while ignoring the flankers. The Flanker effect (incongruent RT minus congruent RT) quantifies attentional interference. This task is a core component of the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery and the Attention Network Test.

ActivitySpec: lamp.flanker

Cognitive domain: Attentional control, conflict resolution, selective attention

Configurationโ€‹

SettingDescription
Trials per ConditionTrials per condition
ConditionsConditions to include
Fixation DurationFixation cross duration (ms)
Stimulus DurationMax stimulus display time (ms)
Feedback DurationFeedback display duration (ms)
API settings fields
Dashboard SettingAPI FieldTypeDefault
Trials per Conditiontrials_per_conditionnumber20
Conditionsconditionsstring"congruent,incongruent,neutral"
Fixation Durationfixation_msnumber500
Stimulus Durationstimulus_duration_msnumber1500
Feedback Durationfeedback_msnumber500

Sample Instructionsโ€‹

"An arrow will appear in the center of the screen. Tap the button matching the direction of the CENTER arrow, ignoring the surrounding arrows."

Usageโ€‹

Each trial presents a row of five arrows. In congruent trials, all arrows point the same direction (e.g., โ†’ โ†’ โ†’ โ†’ โ†’). In incongruent trials, flanker arrows point opposite to the center arrow (e.g., โ† โ† โ†’ โ† โ†). In neutral trials, the center arrow is flanked by dashes (e.g., โ€” โ€” โ†’ โ€” โ€”).

The sequence for each trial is: fixation cross, then the stimulus (displayed for up to 1500 ms), then feedback. The participant taps a button matching the direction of the center arrow. The Flanker effect is computed as incongruent mean RT minus congruent mean RT.

Scoringโ€‹

The Flanker effect (incongruent minus congruent mean RT) is the primary metric. Per-condition accuracy and RT are also reported.

References
  1. Eriksen, B. A. & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16(1), 143-149. DOI: 10.3758/BF03203267

Dataโ€‹

static_dataโ€‹

FieldTypeDescription
flanker_effectnumberIncongruent mean RT minus congruent mean RT (ms)
overall_mean_rtnumberMean RT across all conditions (ms)
overall_accuracynumberProportion correct across all conditions
total_trialsnumberTotal trials
total_correctnumberTotal correct responses
total_errorsnumberTotal errors
congruentobject{count, correct_count, error_count, mean_rt, median_rt, sd_rt}
incongruentobject{count, correct_count, error_count, mean_rt, median_rt, sd_rt}
neutralobject{count, correct_count, error_count, mean_rt, median_rt, sd_rt}
scorenumberOverall score
correct_answersnumberTotal correct
wrong_answersnumberTotal errors
total_questionsnumberTotal trials
questionnaireobjectPost-game ratings: clarity (1-5), happiness (1-5)

temporal_slicesโ€‹

One entry per trial.

FieldTypeDescription
itemnumberTrial index
levelnumberAlways 1
typebooleanWhether the response was correct
valuenullUnused
durationnumberReaction time (ms)
targetstringDirection of center arrow ("left" or "right")
responsestringParticipant's response
conditionstring"congruent", "incongruent", or "neutral"
displaystringThe full arrow display string

Cortex Featuresโ€‹

No Cortex features are currently available for this activity.

View in Portal | Python SDK | API Reference